Mac Os X 10 Views

• Software

To say that Mac OS X has been eagerly awaited by Mac users is an understatement. Apple has been trying to produce a successor to the classic Mac OS operating system for almost 15 years. It's a tragicomic litany of code names: Pink, Taligent, Copland, Rhapsody. In the early days (the Pink project was launched in 1987), Mac users paid little attention to these efforts, confident that their current OS was the most advanced in the personal computer market. But as the years passed and competing operating systems evolved, both by adopting Mac-like GUIs and by advancing their core OS features, Mac users--as well as Apple itself--became skittish.

By the time Apple's penultimate next generation OS project, Copland, was mercifully killed in 1996, the situation was dire. Mac users had suffered too many broken promises, and Apple had stumbled down too many blind alleys. By all rights, Copland should have been Apple's last chance. But the acquisition of NeXT and the second coming of Steve Jobs gave Apple one final window of opportunity.

Despite the (comparatively) minor market requirements hiccup of the Rhapsody strategy, the Mac OS X project proceeded with what can only be described as single-minded determination, from its official announcement in May of 1998 to its first release in March of 2001. Dates were missed, features were added and removed, but unlike all earlier efforts, this one produced a shipping product.

And yet the success of Mac OS X is still an open question. Unlike the relatively controlled public image of the Copland project, Mac OS X has endured the increased scrutiny of the Internet age. While Mac users from 1994 to 1996 were treated to optimistic articles and future-world mock-ups in enthusiast publications like MacWorld and MacUser magazine, Mac OS X has been analyzed by a much wider audience.